Shippers, logistics operators, 3PLs & RTTVPTransport Intelligence
Carriers, telematics providers & manufacturersFleet Performance
Carriers & energy suppliersFuel Trace · Coming soon

Transport Intelligence

Turn your transport data into a lever for energy visibility, lower costs and stronger carbon performance.

Three modules to meet your reporting obligations, anticipate the financial impact of the carbon market and decide where to buy and invest across your transport suppliers. Data your supply chain, transport purchasing and CSR teams can use, and your executives can act on.

ISO 14083 GLEC Framework CSRD · ESRS Carbon market
Transport Intelligence platform — Decarbon Planner
Total CO₂
21 076 t
↓ 4,2 % vs 2023
Scope 3.4 · ISO 14083
Average intensity
49,2
↓ 0,9 % vs 2023
gCO₂/tkm · all modes
Shipments
71 975
↓ 4 % vs 2023
Scope 3.4 · ISO 14083
ETS2 exposure
€473 k
↑ from €0 (live 2027)
At €45/tCO₂ · 50% road coverage
Calculation methodology How your CO₂ figures are produced
0 % enriched / connected & enriched
Estimated
0 % · 0 t
GLEC Compliant
100 % · 21 075,9 t
Enriched
0 % · 0 t
Connected & Enriched
0 % · 0 t
ⓘ 100% of emissions rest on estimated or GLEC-compliant factors. Connecting carriers to telematics improves accuracy and can reduce reported CO₂.
Connect carriers
Recognized by the leading standards
Smart Freight Centre — GLEC Gartner ISO 14083 European Commission
Awarded & distinguished
EU Climate Action Clean Tech Open Carbon Accounting Alliance FT 1000 — Europe's Fastest Growing Companies Deloitte Technology Fast 500 Pass French Tech Solar Impulse Efficient Solution
What the solution includes

Three modules, three questions to answer.

Compliance, performance, strategy. Three modules that make your transport activity manageable from real-world data. Activate them independently or combine them.

Active
Module 1

Compliance

Precise, traceable transport data.
Carbon calculated line by line, from real fuel use (energy-based).
Fine-grained allocation by activity, customer and flow.
ISO 14083 · GLEC v3.2 · CountEmissionsEU, with every source traced.
Compliance & CSRD reporting
STANDARDS · COMPLIANCE
ISO 14083:2023OK
GLEC v3.2 · CSRDOK
Active
Module 2

Efficiency

Compare how your carriers actually perform.
Ranked by emission intensity against your benchmark.
Comparison by lane, region and period.
Carbon cost: exposure and year-over-year tracking.
Compared performance
CLASSEMENT · gCO₂/t·km
1Carrier A62
2Carrier B71
Active
Module 3

Strategy

Model your decarbonization pathways.
Predictive scenarios: transport mix, sourcing, volume.
Science-based pathways aligned with SBTi.
Trade-offs across cost, risk and action plans.
A manageable decarbonization plan
TRAJECTOIRE 2030−38%
20242030
Regulatory requirements

Climate reporting requirements are converging on an international scale.

Regulatory frameworks are converging on a single requirement: defensible, auditable Scope 3 data.

01

Carbon market

From 2028, ETS2 puts a carbon cost on road fuel, passed through to the transport prices you pay: around €6,000 per truck per year for 100,000 km. Without each carrier's real consumption and fuel mix, that exposure cannot be quantified.

02

SBTi pathway

SBTi V2 requires a continuous data-quality improvement plan built on supplier-specific data. Without an energy-based approach, performance gaps between your carriers stay invisible and your pathway cannot be demonstrated.

03

Supplier management

Average-factor calculation (t.km × average factor), still the norm, is blind to real consumption, fuel mix and load factor. There is no way to tell the carrier cutting its emissions from the one doing nothing.

04

Calculation rule

CountEmissionsEU makes primary data the basis for calculating transport emissions, following EN ISO 14083:2023. Calculators will need certification by an independent body: in-house spreadsheets and uncertified tools will have to go.

How it works

Your scattered data, one unified intelligence.

Transport Intelligence ingests all your existing data sources and normalizes them under a single methodology, compliant with recognized transport-carbon standards.

01 · Sources
Your data sources
  • ·Fleet Performance (patented sensors, FMS/rFMS signals)
  • ·Third-party telematics (RIO, Webfleet, Transics, Fleetboard)
  • ·TMS and ERP
  • ·Energy invoices
  • ·Shipper data (flows)
02 · Onboarding
Carrier onboarding
  • ·Every carrier onboarded, whatever their TMS or IT maturity
  • ·Multi-source normalization: no more chasing files every month
  • ·Data-sharing scorecards per carrier (completeness, quality)
  • ·Recognized fallback methods when data is missing
03 · Platform
Multi-source normalization
  • ·Ingestion with no heavy IT project up front
  • ·Allocation by activity, customer and flow per ISO 14083:2023
  • ·Every tonne-km labeled as measured or modeled
  • ·Built-in forward modeling
04 · Modules
Three readings of the same data
  • ·Compliance for CSRD reporting
  • ·Efficiency for sourcing and carrier benchmarking
  • ·Strategy for SBTi and ETS2 scenarios
The numbers

18 years of primary data. 
Measurement that never stops.

12 000+
Vehicles analyzed daily across the platform
136 bn
Historical primary fuel data points
Up to 40%
Reduction in reported Scope 3.4 emissions at our clients
18 years
Of accumulated primary consumption data
Scope 3 Transport Visibility

Shippers making their transport Scope 3 visible and auditable.

Manufacturing, food & beverage, retail, healthcare, automotive. European and global shippers use the platform to manage their transport Scope 3.

Case study

Lesaffre moves from annual tracking to monthly management.

A world leader in fermentation, Lesaffre ships from dozens of industrial sites to more than 180 countries. A dense, multimodal transport Scope 3 — long measured once a year, now tracked month by month.

Emissions avoided↓
−22.2%
595.6 tCO₂ avoided
Carbon intensity↓
−23,1
gCO₂/tkm
Fuel under management≡
€1.17M
total cost
Carbon market↑
35 734 €
saved on ETS allowances
Why Fleetenergies

Two approaches to the same problem, one different specialization.

Legacy multimodal transport calculators and Transport Intelligence share the same methodological standards (ISO 14083, GLEC). What differs is the nature of the primary data feeding the calculation.

Criterion Legacy multimodal calculators EcoTransIT World and equivalents Transport Intelligence Fleetenergies
Primary data Average modal intensity factors Real fuel consumption (liters)
Calculation approach Intensity-based: distance × emission factor Energy-based: real energy consumed → CO₂
Granularity Corridors and modal averages Real vehicle, trip and shipment
Data quality (GHG Protocol DQI) Distance-based Fuel-based - higher quality level
Modal coverage All modes: road, rail, sea, air Road -connected fleet and telematics
Methodological standards ISO 14083 · GLEC ISO 14083 · GLEC
Primary use case Comparing multimodal scenarios Auditable Scope 3.4 reporting and ETS2 exposure
Compliance and standards

Compliant with the frameworks that carry authority.

Our methodology complies with the reference standards for well-to-wheel transport emissions accounting, aligned with the European regulation CountEmissionsEU adopted in April 2026, which establishes primary transport data as a legal principle. Our calculations are accepted by auditors as part of CSRD reporting.

Methodological standards
ISO 14083:2023
Well-to-wheel methodological framework
GLEC Framework v3.2
Global industry framework
EN 16258
European transport standard
iLEAP / PACT
Carbon data interoperability
CountEmissionsEU
EU regulation — April 2026
Regulatory compliance
CSRD
Sustainability reporting — limited assurance
ETS2
Transport carbon market — 2028 horizon
SBTi
Science-based pathways
External recognition
Accredited by Smart Freight Centre for GLEC Framework compliance.
Gartner Hype Cycle 2025 — Transportation Carbon Management Solutions category.
Frequently asked questions

Your questions, our answers.

How does Transport Intelligence connect to my existing data?+

We handle ingestion from your existing sources: telematics (ours via Fleet Performance, or third-party such as RIO, Webfleet, Transics, Fleetboard), TMS, ERP, energy invoices, shipper data. You don't need a heavy IT project up front. Our methodology and data-engineering teams scope the sources, validate ISO 14083 compliance, and deliver.

I'm a shipper, but my carriers aren't equipped with Fleet Performance. Does it still work?+

Yes. Transport Intelligence ingests several sources: third-party OEM telematics, TMS, ERP, energy invoices, carrier-declared data. If you're a shipper who wants to start with transport emissions data independent of your carriers, take a look at Fuel Trace (coming soon) too.

Transport Intelligence becomes especially powerful when you combine your own data (TMS, invoices) with reliable carrier data from Fleet Performance or Fuel Trace (coming soon).

What's the difference between an intensity-based approach (GLEC default, EcoTransIT) and Transport Intelligence's energy-based approach?+

An intensity-based approach calculates emissions by multiplying tonne-kilometers by an average emission factor (gCO₂e/t.km) drawn from statistical libraries such as GLEC default or ADEME's Base Carbone. It's the mainstream method in 2026, defensible under CSRD limited assurance, but it erases the real gaps between carriers: two providers on the same lane look identical even if one burns less or runs on HVO.

The energy-based approach starts from the real energy consumption (liters, kWh, kg of HVO) of the vehicle that did the job, and applies that fuel's specific well-to-wheel factor. That's what makes it possible to tell carriers apart, document ETS2 deductions on alternative fuels, and reach the DQI level required by CountEmissionsEU and SBTi V2 on material Scope 3 flows.

What's the difference between Compliance, Efficiency and Strategy?+

Compliance answers “how do I document my current emissions.” Efficiency answers “which of my carriers actually performs best, and how do I use that in an RFP.” Strategy answers “which scenarios to consider for the coming years, and how much ETS2 will cost over 2028–2032.”

Many clients start with Compliance, fold Efficiency into their annual sourcing cycle, and switch on Strategy when the sustainability team builds its SBTi plan.

Is ETS2 really built in, or will it need an update?+

ETS2 modeling has been part of the Strategy module from the start. Changes to the scheme and reference prices (€45 to €100/tCO₂ depending on the scenario, i.e. 12 to 26 cents per liter of diesel) are integrated on an ongoing basis by our regulatory team.

Who in my organization will use the platform?+

It depends on the modules: sustainability team (Compliance), transport operations (Efficiency), executive and strategy teams (Strategy). Roles and access rights are configurable.

How much does it cost?+

Modular annual pricing, calibrated to the scope (number of vehicles or flows tracked) and the modules activated. We put together a quote after a demo and a quick scoping session.

« »

What the platform gives us is the ability to run quick little scenarios to measure the impact of the initiatives we put in place. That's exactly where it matters most to us.

 HUGO C ·Transport Manager 

Book a demo

See what your data really says.

30 minutes to walk you through it Transport Intelligence.

Talk to an expert
30 minutes. We listen to your situation and point you to the right solution.